![]() However, any action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul the board's decision must be commenced and service of summons effected within 90 days after the date of the decision. (Ibid.) The board's decision is subject to judicial review. If it determines that the property does not comply, the board must issue a certificate of compliance or conditional certificate of compliance informing the owner of conditions which must be fulfilled before a development permit will be granted. further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise specified.) If the board determines that the property complies, it must issue a certificate of compliance so stating. Government Code section 66499.35 provides that, upon the request of an owner of real property, the county board of supervisors shall determine whether the property complies with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Having decided to sell portions of their property located in Shasta County, plaintiffs asked defendants for a determination that the property complied with the Subdivision Map Act. Barfield as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents. Leonard Wingate for Plaintiffs and Respondents. Campbell, Wells, Wingate, Small & Graham, Robert A. Weintraub, Genshlea, Hardy, Erich & Brown, Dale C. Flushman as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. McDonough, Washburn, Briscoe & McCarthy and Bruce S. Herr, County Counsel (Santa Cruz), Jonathan Wittwer, Chief Deputy County Counsel (Santa Cruz), Nancy N. Fisher for Defendants and Appellants.ĭwight L. Frank, County Counsel, McDonough, Holland & Allen, Mark A. (Opinion by Scotland, J., with Carr, Acting P. COUNTY OF SHASTA et al., Defendants and Appellants. JOHN DOWELL HUNT et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |